Dick.

Over the past week, Ohio Superintendent of Schools Dr. Richard Ross has been forced to admit that his office manipulated grades to improve the ratings of charter school sponsors, a crime known as "scrubbing" the scores, which got some teachers and school administrators jail time,

AND he concealed his work on the Youngstown Amendment from the State School Board while he took them on tours in Youngstown's schools and encouraged them to work on solutions for the very schools he secretly planned to privatize through said amendment.

Complete the following sentence...

Dr. Richard Ross...

a) is a criminal who should immediately resign his post pending an investigation.

b) has the greatest push broom moustache in the history of government.

c) will keep his position and continue to wrong Ohio's school kids.

d) all of the above.

Stop calling. OK, keep calling.

The Governor signed HB70 into law today. You can stop calling him, unless you're calling to rail against him for other reasons (like Ohio being 49th in the nation in job creation), or you're calling in order to take part in scream therapy. Far be it from me to dictate actions associated with your psychological well-being.

On second thought, let's keep calling him (whatever name you like) because the manner in which the Youngstown Amendment passed is an affront to democracy, and the ridiculous array of powers it doles out to a single individual are frightening.

If you've forgotten the gyst of the Youngstown Amendment, Patrick O'Donnell does a fine job paring it down in this article...

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2015/07/a_quick_look_at_the_new_state_takeover_plan_for_failing_school_districts.html#incart_related_stories

Check it out. I'll wait.

Good, you're back and pissed off again. You're welcome. Now call the Governor and tell him about himself. After all, is this any way for the future President of the United States to act? No, it is not, which is why I'm rallying for the Democratic Socialist from Vermont.

I have also contacted my Senator and Representative, Gayle and Nathan Manning respectively, and they have graciously extended an invitation to my wife and I to meet next week to discuss this legislation. I hope to get a better grasp on the ramifications for Youngstown, and also for Lorain, which is currently in Academic Distress and could fall under the same rules in 2017-2018. 

For what it's worth, if my math is right, any given school district is 3-5 years from complete takeover by a state appointed CEO (depending on safe harbor and the maintenance of successful scores on state assessments that we haven't seen yet). So, if you're someone who has trouble with empathy and doesn't do shit unless it effects you, then act now so it doesn't effect you.

Here's Kasich's number...

(614)466-3555

Here's where to find your State Representative...

http://www.ohiohouse.gov/members/member-directory

Here's where to find your State Senator...

http://www.ohiosenate.gov/members/senate-directory

Welcome to Youngstown. We are all Youngstown.

HELP!

Kasich will be signing HB70, including the Youngstown Amendment on Thursday. Contact him in order to voice your outrage. Encourage him to VETO the bill because of the Youngstown Amendment.

Call his office at this number...

(614)466-3555

Contact him through email here...

http://www.governor.ohio.gov/Contact/ContacttheGovernor.aspx

Here's his Twitter handle...

@JohnKasich

After you contact him, do yourself a favor and search Lego John Kasich on Twitter.

Alright tear it up.

On behalf of Youngstown Public Schools and public schools everywhere, thanks.

Prophets and Pariahs

It is July, and with my district's calendar set to begin earlier this year in order to fit more prep time prior to state assessments, it is time to consider the coming year. In a little more than a month I'll meet 130 or so sophomores brimming with enthusiasm at the prospect of learning American History, and (better yet) being tested by the state of Ohio on their acquired knowledge of American History, in order to facilitate their graduation, overall sense of accomplishment, and self-actualization.

On day one, I will be able to report that their state legislators have worked in their interest to revise the albatross of a testing system that they suffered through last year. The state's budget bill has dumped PARCC, I will inform them, limited the testing to a single window, moved the tests nearer the end of the year, assured a quick turnaround on scores, and promised shorter assessments overall.

Upon delivering said information to my classes, I imagine the cheers will be heard for miles around before we share high-fives, and our laughter mixes with tears of joy. The religious might offer up a quick prayer of thanks, while the non-religious will simply shake their heads in disbelief at an example of adults in leadership roles doing the right thing. Their faith in the goodness of humankind will be restored. I will become something of a prophet and cult hero having delivered the information.

I conservatively estimate that this celebration will last through the first few days of school. By day three, having exhausted a case of tissues, and nearly suffered dehydration through the expulsion of tears, we will begin to regain control. At this point, a conscientious hand will rise in the back of the room.

Mr. Jablonski, exactly when will the tests occur?

Well, I'm not sure.

How long will they be?

Uh, PARCC was going to shorten them by 15%, but Senator Lehner, Head of the Education Committee, said she'd like to see them shortened by 50%, but the law did not specifically indicate how short they'd have to be. So, I guess somewhere between half as long and not shortened at all.

So, we might have to take a 3 hour assessment in a single testing window?

Well, that's terribly pessimistic, but yes.

What will the tests look like? Like, how many essays, how long will they have to be? How much multiple choice? Are there source readings? Will they be long? Boring? And how does this effect the graduation requirement? Will we take the tests with our class? Or homeroom? Or be placed in testing groups with administrators we don't know?

And just like last year, this group of students will be met with a resounding and unfair, "I don't know."

And most assuredly my hero status will plummet, and I will be a pariah, trying to balance something of a meaningful American History course while schlepping test prep materials in order to meet the demands of an albatross of an assessment system.

No, I don't know what the tests will be like, kids, but I know that without a proper process to assure their reliability and validity, those tests will judge your merit as my student, my value as your teacher, the quality of our school, and the accomplishments of our district. Now let's get to it.

A Vendor Has Been Chosen.

In a remarkable (or predictable) turn of events, the state of Ohio has chosen AIR as its test vendor less than 24 hours after abandoning PARCC. In this photo, Ohio Governor John Kasich is trying his hand at the new 4th grade reading test just written by the American Institutes for Research. The test is piled there to the Governor's left.

"You know what I like best about the park?"

"You know what I like best about the park?" is what I heard a kid on my soccer team ask me.

"What?" I played along. "That I don't have to take them."

Well, of course, he meant PARCC, and as we found out yesterday, nobody has to take them because Ohio has passed legislation that forbids that vendor from providing tests.

In some sense this is good news. So, first, thank you to that kid, and his parents as well as all of the other kids and parents that had the courage to refuse the tests. Thank you to the handful of parent activists here in Elyria who got this thing rolling locally, and continued to provide information and raise hell as the movement spread throughout the county. Thanks as well to those state-wide who played a similar role, those who wrote letters to the editor, contacted legislators, spoke publicly against the intrusive assessment system, or simply educated themselves and others.

Now that we're done patting ourselves on the back, let's look at this for what it is, a small victory. Yes, PARCC is gone, but as I've been saying all along, the American Institutes for Research wrote the Social Studies and Science tests to be PARCC-like (read confusing and inappropriate). Guess who has the inside track to write the new assessments. You guessed it, AIR. So, in all likelihood, the next thing could be just as convoluted and demoralizing as the last thing. Sorry, I don't mean to bring you down.

I know, they've done away with the multiple testing windows. Testing will occur on a single occasion near the end of the year and be shorter in length according to the legislation. Don't get me wrong, the move to one testing window is awesome, a clear win, less intrusive, but how long is the test? The legislation fails to spell out an exact time limit for assessments. Senator Lehner said she hoped to see the testing time cut by half, but this is not in the legislation.

Also, when will they take place? My school year begins in a month and a half. I am developing lessons and setting the pace of my course. Where is my end point? What is the nature of the assessment? How many and what type of questions? You see, my students will have to pass this test in order to graduate. So, while the legislators are patting themselves on the back and heading off to their own summer break, I'm going to prepare to head into yet another school year where my colleagues and I will have very little information regarding the assessments under which we're all being judged.

And as long as I'm being pessimistic about this thing, there is still completely unnecessary testing from 3rd through 8th grade that seems to exist for the sole purpose of grading schools and teachers. These tests have created a culture of assessment, a season (or longer) of anxiety, and despite the new deadlines for feedback on results, will likely still provide absolutely no meaningful information from which to inform instruction. We've been testing like this for better than a decade to bridge the achievement gap and improve college readiness, to leave no child behind. It is not working.

Don't misunderstand me, the developments regarding Ohio's assessment system as passed into law in the budget are a victory. However, we shouldn't get ahead of ourselves. This is a beginning. We have collectively created change, but it is a change (while an improvement) to another imperfect, intrusive, and unnecessary high-stakes testing system.

Congratulations? I'm going to the park.

Send one email?

Yesterday I posted the lists of the legislators, their votes on HB70 (Youngstown), and contact info as put together by my wife. I suggested we contact them. You don't have to hassle them all. We're busy people. It's unhealthy to spend the whole day in a state of rage. So, can you write one of them? That's it, just one. I'll be honest, I've only contacted four so far. I got ahold of my Senator and Rep, the Manning's, to thank them for voting against it. I contacted Rep Brenner yesterday, as I said I would. And this morning I wrote Senator Peggy Lehner, head of the Senate Education Committee, vocal champion, and carrier of this piece of legislation. I hoped to point out what I saw as some inconsistency in her legislative process with regard to education (see below).

So, what do you think? One email? Let me know.

Here's Peggy...

Here's my email to Peggy...

Senator Lehner, 

I am a 16th year History Teacher at Elyria High School. I was hoping, as the head of the Senate Education Committee, you could clarify something for me. Upon being presented with a multitude of concerns regarding state assessments from hundreds, if not thousands, of parents, teachers, students, and other experts in the field, your response was to establish a commission to study the issue. In the meantime, Ohio's students were expected to grind through a season of unfair, wholly intrusive, damaging, and unnecessary assessments. As it stands, it remains unclear what the assessments will look like next year, despite the fact that teachers like myself are well into planning and strategizing the shape of our courses. 

However, when presented with the Youngstown Amendment, you opted for a rule of order that eliminated due process by not allowing opposition, or public input, thus making a mockery of our democratic process, not to mention your own prior record of "investigation" in the interest of proper decision making with regard to educational policy decisions. Then you had the audacity, in all of your moon-faced sincerity, to tell the public that this act was in the best interest of the children of Youngstown because something had to be done. 

How about, something has to be done about assessments, something has to be done about the albatross of an evaluation system, something has to be done about the mismanagement of funds in charter schools, or the fact that they are academic failures, or that Ohio is a national laughingstock because of our charter school policy. Senator, with all due respect, I do not expect that you will be able to satisfactorily justify your hypocrisy in this situation. I do, however, expect you to do something to actually benefit your youngest constituents, Ohio's schoolchildren, and to show some respect for the democratic process. 

Yours in education. 
Matthew Jablonski